Osha vs Ghs
Hello,
today I am going to type my next blog. This blog is about the differences
between OSHA and GHS. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA) is an agency of the United States Department of
Labor. Congress created the agency
under the Occupational Safety and Health
Act, which President Nixon
signed into law on December 29, 1970. OSHA's mission
is to "assure safe and healthful working conditions for working men and
women by enforcing standards and providing training, outreach, education and
assistance". The agency is also charged with enforcing a variety of whistleblower statutes and
regulations. OSHA is currently headed by Assistant Secretary of Labor David Michaels. OSHA's workplace safety inspections have been shown
to reduce injury rates and injury costs without effects to employment, sales,
credit ratings, or firm survival. OSHA is responsible for enforcing its
standards on regulated entities. Compliance Safety and Health Officers carry
out inspections and assess fines for regulatory violations. Inspections are
planned for worksites in particularly hazardous industries. Inspections can
also be triggered by a workplace fatality, multiple hospitalizations, worker
complaints, or referrals. It evolves around the cost of regulations and
enforcement, versus the actual benefit in reduced worker injury, illness and
death. A 1995 study of several OSHA standards by the Office of Technology
Assessment (OTA) found that OSHA relies "generally on methods that provide
a credible basis for the determinations essential to rulemakings". Though
it found that OSHA's finding and estimates are "subject to vigorous review
and challenge", it stated that this is natural because "interested
parties and experts involved in rulemakings have differing visions"
now to talk about GHS. GHS stands for The Globally Harmonized System of Classification
and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) is an
internationally agreed-upon system, created by the United Nations beginning in 1992 and as of 2015 is not yet fully
implemented in many countries. It was designed to replace the various
classification and labelling standards used in different countries by using
consistent criteria on a global level. It supersedes the relevant system of the European Union, which has
implemented the United Nations' GHS into EU law as the CLP Regulation and United
States Occupational
Safety and Health Administration standards.
The Globally
Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) was
developed beginning at the United Nations Rio Conference in 1992, when the International Labor
Organization (ILO),
the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), various governments and other
stakeholders met at a United Nations conference. Before it was created and
implemented, there were many different regulations on hazard classification in
use in different countries. While those systems may have been similar in
content and approach, they resulted in multiple standards, classifications and
labels for the same hazard. Given the extent of international trade in
chemicals and the potential impact on neighboring countries when controls are
not implemented, countries determined that a worldwide approach was necessary.
The GHS was
designed as one universal standard for all countries to follow and to replace
all the diverse classification systems; however, it is not compulsory under UN
law. The system provides the infrastructure for participating countries to
implement a hazard classification and hazard communication standard, which many
less economically developed countries would not have had the money to create
themselves. In the longer term, the GHS is expected to improve knowledge of the
chronic health hazards of
chemicals and encourage a move towards the elimination of hazardous chemicals,
especially carcinogens, mutagens and reproductive toxicants,
or their replacement with less hazardous ones. There are big differences and
big similarities between both. But when it comes down to it. They were both put
in place to make sure workers are safe and can survive in a healthy work
environment. To learn more about each, please click on the links below.
No comments:
Post a Comment